O'Brien decries a lost opportunity for Biden in Ukraine

Analyzing the article

The Atlantic

Our Analysis: 1 Fallacy

In practice, the Biden administration has treated the Ukraine conflict like a crisis to be managed, not a war to be won. The administration doesn't seem to understand that Russia can be beaten.

For all of their caution, Biden and his foreign-policy experts have been caught unaware more than once...

While Phillips Payson O’Brien presents a valid critique of the administration's cautious approach potentially limiting Ukraine's military capabilities, it oversimplifies complex geopolitical dynamics and attributes the duration of the war too directly to Biden's actions, without considering broader international factors or alternative strategies.

1. historian's fallacy • O'Brien judges past decisions based on current knowledge and outcomes, assuming that the Biden administration should have acted differently with the benefit of hindsight.


When Putin was gathering his invasion force in late 2021 and early 2022... the Biden administration didn't understand what it was looking at. U.S. officials assumed that if Putin went ahead with his plans, Ukraine would stand no chance...


O'Brien later notes that Putin's forces faced major problems in morale, corruption, and logistics, while Ukrainians showed better-than-expected resilience and adaptability. But these facts were not known to observers prior to the invasion.

References

Comments

In order to participate in the conversation, head over to your account and setup a Screen Name
In order to participate in the conversation, you must sign in.
In order to participate in the conversation, you must sign up or sign in.

Disclaimer

Note that there being one or more apparent fallacies in the arguments presented in this article does not mean that every argument the arguer made was fallacious, nor does it mean there are not other arguments in existence for the same or similar position that are logically valid. Also note that checking for fallacies is not the same as verification of the premises the arguer starts from, such as facts that the arguer asserts or principles that the arguer assumes as the foundation for constructing arguments. For more about this, see our 'What is Fallacy Checking?'

NO AI TRAINING

Without in any way limiting the author’s [and publisher’s] exclusive rights under copyright, any use of this publication to “train” generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to generate text is expressly prohibited. The author reserves all rights to license uses of this work for generative AI training and development of machine learning language models.

Greetings! Kindly review our privacy and cookie policies to assess your preferences regarding cookie engagement.