MODERATOR: Former President Trump, to follow up, you would be 82 at the end of your second term. What do you say to voters who have concerns about your capabilities to serve?
TRUMP: Well, I took two tests, cognitive tests. I aced them, both of them, as you know. We made it public. He took none. I'd like to see him take one, just one, a real easy one. Like go through the first five questions, he couldn't do it. But I took two cognitive tests. I took physical exams every year. And, you know, we knock on wood, wherever we may have wood, that I'm in very good health.
At the presidential debate, Trump argues that his cognitive test results and personal assessment of his physical fitness demonstrate his capability to serve as president, despite his age. However, his reliance on ridiculing Biden and making some vague comparisons weakens the overall validity of his arguments.
1. appeal to ridicule • Trump mocks Biden's golfing abilities instead of addressing the concerns about his age and fitness for office.
He can't hit a ball 50 yards. He challenged me to a golf match. He can't hit a ball 50 yards.
Trump attempts to undermine Biden by ridiculing his golfing ability. However, golfing prowess has little to no bearing on one's fitness for the presidency.
2. questionable comparison • Trump equates winning golf club championships with the cognitive and physical capabilities required for the presidency, which are not comparable measures of fitness for office.
I just won two club championships, not even senior, two regular club championships.
Trump implies that winning regular club championships is more difficult or impressive than winning senior championships. However, this assumes the skill levels and competition are directly comparable, which is unlikely. Senior championships likely feature players with different skill sets and experience levels than "regular" championships.
Even if winning a regular club championship were considered more challenging, it doesn't directly translate to the skills and capabilities required for the presidency. The comparison doesn't offer relevant evidence for his fitness to serve in office.
By presenting this skewed comparison, Trump attempts to bolster his image of strength and capability, but the comparison lacks a sound basis and ultimately distracts from the real issue at hand.
Note that there being one or more apparent fallacies in the arguments presented in this article does not mean that every argument the arguer made was fallacious, nor does it mean there are not other arguments in existence for the same or similar position that are logically valid. Also note that checking for fallacies is not the same as verification of the premises the arguer starts from, such as facts that the arguer asserts or principles that the arguer assumes as the foundation for constructing arguments. For more about this, see our 'What is Fallacy Checking?'
Without in any way limiting the author’s [and publisher’s] exclusive rights under copyright, any use of this publication to “train” generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to generate text is expressly prohibited. The author reserves all rights to license uses of this work for generative AI training and development of machine learning language models.
Comments