Williams criticizes NPR's take on fossil fuels and economic growth

Analyzing the article

The New York Post

false dilemma

ad hominem

causal oversimplification

Our Analysis: 3 Fallacies

¹ Fossil fuels -- not renewables -- remain the real engines behind economic growth.

…

The overall decline in US greenhouse gas emissions was driven by a large reduction -- 8% -- in emissions from power plants.

That didn't happen because we started using unicorn smiles and good intentions to generate electricity.

² It happened because we are using more natural gas and less coal, a trend that has been driven in the long term not by environmental policy but because natural gas is generally more economically efficient for running power plants.

…

As NPR reports, US emissions today are 17.2% below 2005 levels.

And that is not because of some grand Green New Deal: It is largely due to the availability of cheap natural gas, much of it acquired through -- ³ horrors! -- the combination of modern extraction techniques colloquially known as "fracking."

…

NPR isn't alone in having some difficulty admitting forthrightly that this is a climate success story driven by fossil fuels.

Because climate change has been turned into a moral and ³ quasi-religious crusade…

1. False dichotomy • The text presents a false dichotomy between fossil fuels and renewables as the only two potential drivers of economic growth, and speaks as if all the credit for growth must be given exclusively to just one of them. However, it is likely that both of them can drive growth, and that other factors like advancements in technology, infrastructure, and human capital can also significantly contribute to economic growth.

2. Causal oversimplification • Attributing the decline in US greenhouse gas emissions solely to the shift from coal to natural gas is an oversimplification. Factors like increased energy efficiency, improved renewable energy sources, and policy changes also play a role.

3. Ad hominem • The use of "horrors!" when referring to fracking sarcastically attacks environmentalists rather than providing evidence against their positions. The tactic is employed again when environmentalism is construed as a "quasi-religious crusade."

References

Kevin D. Williamson (2024, Jan 20). Fossil fuels -- not renewables -- remain the real engines behind economic growth.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/opinion/fossil-fuels-remain-the-real-engine-behind-economic-growth/

Comments

In order to participate in the conversation, head over to your account and setup a Screen Name

In order to participate in the conversation, you must sign in.

In order to participate in the conversation, you must sign up or sign in.

Disclaimer

Note that there being one or more apparent fallacies in the arguments presented in this article does not mean that every argument the arguer made was fallacious, nor does it mean there are not other arguments in existence for the same or similar position that are logically valid. Also note that checking for fallacies is not the same as verification of the premises the arguer starts from, such as facts that the arguer asserts or principles that the arguer assumes as the foundation for constructing arguments. For more about this, see our 'What is Fallacy Checking?'

NO AI TRAINING

Without in any way limiting the author’s [and publisher’s] exclusive rights under copyright, any use of this publication to “train” generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to generate text is expressly prohibited. The author reserves all rights to license uses of this work for generative AI training and development of machine learning language models.